ROUGH DRAFT GOOGLE SHARE (SUNDAY UPDATE)

Please share your paper with the other two people listed and Prof. Parks by CLASS TIME Friday. You have until 11:30 p.m Sunday to put the comments/responses onto their papers using the COMMENT function in GoogleDrive. If you have problems, contact me before class. Search using LAST NAMES if their names do not come up immediately in RavenMail.

Rough Draft Requirements: 2-3 pages (600-800 words); Double Spaced, Times New Roman, 12 pt, MLA format. Include citations as needed. *Less than 600 words will result in point deductions. More than 800 is ok, but try not to go past 1000 words. 

1:00 Class: Share your Papers with the following People and ME by Class Time Friday:

1. Olanike Onimole, Nicholas Smith, Samuel Bate

2. Jordan Sawyer, Kennedy Wallace, Kara Werline, David Meinen

3. Dylan Moffitt, Morgan Schroeder, Tessa Williams

4. Ben Burney, Nate Urban, James (Wes) Seabright

5. Anna Canova, Caleb Fettner, Levi Scott, Il Doo Park

6. Katlyn McCullough, Remmick Rogers, Devin Hartzell

2:00 Class: Share your Papers 

1. Sam Rainey, David Patrick, Josiah Mercer

2. Christa Combs, Isaac Denniston, Troy Welman

3. Lisandra Banks, Haley Reifel, Kristi Swiger

4. Austin Price, Alesha Smith, Mitchell Stacey

5. Mariah Hines, Brittany Hankins, Alexander Ruckman

6. Austin Bishop, Erin Clouse, Austin Smith

7. Erin Mace, Tibarek Admassie, Joey Cardenas

8. Andrew McGlamery, Alex Merkel, Jacob Morgan

**Please use pp. 306-307 in the CONCISE GUIDE as a basis for your comments. Everyone should put comments on the following. Thus, there should be no less than 10 total marginal comments from each classmate.

1) Presenting the Subject. Tell the writer where the subject is presented effectively. Indicate where readers might need more detailed information about the subject or where information seems only partly true or accurate.

2) Assess How Well the Judgment is Supported: Identify a passage where the judgment is supported effectively.  Let the writer know if you cannot find a thesis or if you think it is OVERSTATED or VAGUE.

3) Consider how Effectively Objections and Alternative Judgments are Counter-Argued. Comment where the writer counter-argues well. Place one comment on a section where they could add in a counterargument or where you think they might strengthen or clarify a counterargument.

4) Organization/Readability: Give one comment on an effective transition between paragraphs or where you think the essay flows well. Give one comment where the readability could be improved, such as a more effective ending? A stronger intro? Or some other place where they could rearrange?

5) Identify and label sentences that offer: 1) Criticism with Praise  2) Comparison

*Ideally, this essay should have at least 3 different sentences that either balance criticism and praise and/or offer comparisons. If the student does not use these sentence strategies, please indicate where those could be incorporated.

6) Look for vague or BANNED words such as: GOOD, BAD, ENTERTAINING, NEAT, AWESOME, UNIQUE, BORING, FUNNY, PERFECT.  (If they are using these words, alert them!!! : )